1. The decision made by the Intellectual Property Tribunal on December 14, 2016 on a case No. 1857 shall be revoked.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

1. Basic facts

A. On June 29, 2016, the Defendant asserted that the nonobviousness of the instant patent invention is denied by the Claim 2, 3, 4, 8, 9, and 10 as indicated in the foregoing paragraph (b) below, and the Claim 1 is identical to the Prior Invention 1, 2, and the Claim 3, 4, 8, 9, and 10 according to the Cited Invention 1, 2, and the Claim 1 is identical to the Prior Invention 1, 2, and 3. The nonobviousness of the instant patent invention is denied by the Intellectual Property Tribunal on December 14, 2016.

3) Accordingly, the Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit seeking revocation of the part for which patent invalidation was invalidated on the grounds that non-obviousness of the claim 2, 3, 4, 8, 9, and 10 of the instant patent invention is denied. (b) The title of the instant patent invention (Evidence A 1 and 2): The title of the instant patent invention is a device that electronically connects the two subjects. The filing date/registration date/registration date/registration number: November 11, 2008; patent holder Nos. 1,019, 721 of the instant patent invention: (a) in the previous case of the outline of the Plaintiff’s invention, the contact with the adjacent colons is difficult to ensure stable electrical connection because of the contact with the adjacent colons; (b) there is a concern that the instant patent invention might escape from repeated pressures; and (c) there is a limit to the entire number of the adjacent colons [the entire number of 00do 96] in the direction that they want to leave.