1. The decision made by the Intellectual Property Tribunal on November 30, 2016 on the case No. 1861 shall be revoked.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

1. Basic facts

A. On June 29, 2016, the Plaintiff added new claims 1, 2 to the amendment made on March 12, 2007, which was prior to the registration of the instant patent invention, as indicated in the foregoing paragraph (b). Claim 1 was denied by comparable invention 1, 2, and 4 through 10, and Claim 1 was not new by comparison invention 1, 2, and 4 through 10, and Claim 1 through 6 were not denied by comparison invention 1, 2, and the comparison invention 1 through 6, 202-079350, Japan’s Patent Gazette 201-8481, Japan’s Patent Gazette 203-2, Japan’s Patent Gazette 1, 201-2, and Japan’s Patent Gazette 201 to 30, Japan’s Patent Gazette 1, 201-7539, Japan’s Patent Gazette 206, respectively.

'The decision of this case was rendered to dismiss the plaintiff's above appeal for reasons.

B. The title of the patented invention of this case (Evidence A 2 and 3): The sponsive sponsive sponsive sponsive sponsive sponsive sponsive sponsive sponsive sponsive sponsive sponsive sponsive sponsives

KONNEX and its absence, and wafer Inspection Devices andwafer Inspection Method / International Date/ Translation Submission Date/ Translation Submission Date/Registration Number: February 18, 2003.