Defendants are not guilty

1. On July 8, 2012, Defendant A, who was the complainant of May 11, 1983 and was the spouse of Defendant A who reported marriage with Defendant E, who was the complainant of May 11, 1983, sent B and once sexual intercourse from the Defendant’s house located under F apartment No. 101 and 1104, F apartment-gu, Busan. Defendant B, despite being aware of Defendant A’s spouse, was sexual intercourse with Defendant A at the above time and at the above place.

2. Determination:

A. As evidence corresponding to the facts charged in the instant case, there are statements in investigation agencies and courts of E, and one place of cremation in which the genes of the Defendants is detected.

B. First, in the investigation agency and this court, the complainant: (a) stated that “The complainant was frighting from his house with the Defendants, and 10-15 minutes away from his house with the kitchen, and the Defendants did not seem to be able to go to the ward; and (b) the Defendants fright to go to the ward by cutting off the outside; (c) stated the outside on the ward’s house and frighting back to the recycling box where the fright was beer and frighted; (d) opened a big door to the ward sofright softened softened with the spirit of TV, and (d) opened a large door to fright, and the Defendant B was frighting from her beer and panty while playing, and the Defendants A was found to have been frighted with the phone, and then frighted with the frighting phone, and then the fright was found to have been found to have been found to have been frighted by the fright and frighting.”

The statement of the complainant is that it is difficult to view that the defendants have a sexual intercourse in the same place in the apartment of 31-year in which the living room and the kitchen are attached, and the kitchen is located in the kitchen.