Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, it is against the Defendants for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a spouse who has completed a marriage report with D on September 4, 2006.

On June 22, 2013, the Defendant sent to the Defendant’s residence in Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City E-building 603, with a sexual intercourse with B and once.

2. Defendant B, even though he was aware that the above spouse was a person who was a spouse, had a sexual intercourse with A once.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. The Defendants’ partial statements and D’s statements among each prosecutor’s interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. The defendant Eul's legal statement of the defendant A that the defendant Gap had a legal spouse and the interview that the defendant Eul sent to the defendant Eul ("the first side of the complaint"), in light of the contents of the conversation, on-site photograph, marriage relation certificate, and the receipt of the divorce judgment (the date and place stated in the facts charged, and there is no fact that the defendant had a sexual relation with the defendant Eul, and the defendant Eul was not aware of the legal spouse of the defendant Eul. However, the evidence stated in the judgment, in particular, in light of the defendants' legal statement of the defendant A that the defendant Eul had a hostile relationship with the defendant Eul during the divorce lawsuit, and the contents of the interview that the defendant Eul sent to the defendant Eul ("the first side of the complaint, the first side of the complaint), the defendant Eul was well aware of the fact that the defendant Eul was a legal spouse. Furthermore, the lease of the office of the defendant Eul who was living separately with the defendant Eul and the above office of the defendant A and the defendant's clothes in the future.

The Defendant A was mixed with the Defendant, and there was clothes, cosmetics, personal bankbooks, etc. of Defendant B, and the Defendants received from around 02:25 on June 23, 2013, and in particular, it is reasonable to deem that they were given and received after completion of the actual sexual relationship. “Chur’s husband and wife was in accordance with B,” “Isn’t know that I had been in gold.”