Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
No person shall transfer or take over any access medium to another person in using or managing the access medium.
On March 2014, the Defendant was called “to lend KRW 500-1,000,000 if a new bank account is opened and a physical card is opened and sent,” from a person in the name of the Defendant, at the construction site located at the beginning of the Hanam-si at the end of the end of the end of the day.”
However, on November 11, 2012, the Defendant had been under investigation by the Gyeonggi-dong Police Station in the Gyeonggi-do Police Station for the transfer of a separate account (including the “scaming” fraud using the above account) and had been sentenced to the suspension of indictment on the charge of the above suspected charge (violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act) at the prosecutor’s office in Suwon District on January 8, 2014. The Defendant was aware that the media access to the account was acquired from the organization of “scaming” in the name of “scam” and could be used for the crime of “scaming” by acquiring the media.
Nevertheless, at the end of March 2014, the Defendant issued a personal identification number of the said account to the Agricultural Cooperative Account (Account Number: E) in the name of the Defendant to Kwikset Service Articles around the construction site. On March 2014, the Defendant issued a personal identification number to “D” in the name of the Defendant.
Accordingly, at around 10:00 on April 1, 2014, a member of the Mediation Division of Bospishing “Sspishing” had the victim F transfer KRW 9.5 million to the said No. Agricultural Cooperative Account under the name of the Defendant, “Any personal information leaked was partially withdrawn, and any money was remitted to the account known to prevent additional damage.”
As a result, the Defendant aided and aided the “scaming” staff to facilitate the commission of fraud, and transferred the access media at the same time.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;
1. Details of financial transactions;