1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. From July 9, 2007, the Plaintiff, who was employed as an employee belonging to Sora Construction Co., Ltd., was around September 3, 2007, and around September 3, 2007, caused an accident under which the Plaintiff, who was employed as a worker of Sora Construction Co., Ltd., was sent to the engineers of other workshops and electrical fields at the site of 3 works in Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan City B apartment construction works in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, and the pipe was cut, and the pipe was cut. Accordingly, the Plaintiff caused an accident under the bottom of the pipe. The Plaintiff’s disease (hereinafter “the instant injury”).

(B) On June 29, 201, the Defendant filed an application for medical treatment with respect to the Defendant, asserting that the Defendant received medical treatment.

B. The Defendant is an injury or disease already approved by the non-approval of the pre-approval of the pre-approval of the pre-approval of the pre-approval of the pre-approval of the re-approval of the medical care (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on July 13, 201, since the Defendant is a medical opinion that the pre-approval of the pre-approval of the Non-approval of the Medical Care Benefits (hereinafter “instant disposition”). The pre-approval of the Non-approval of the Medical Care Benefits (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

C. The Plaintiff dissatisfied with the instant disposition and filed a request for review with the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Review Committee on November 8, 201. The Plaintiff filed a request for review with the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Review Committee on February 10, 2012, but filed the instant lawsuit on April 13, 2012 upon receiving a dismissal ruling from the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Review Committee.

[Reasons for Recognition] Each entry of Gap's 1, 2, 32, 33, Eul's 1, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the injury or disease of this case occurred from September 10, 2007, and constitutes occupational accidents.

Therefore, this is different.