logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2020.07.22 2020고단448
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who runs the Internet computer game facility business from December 2, 2018 to the name of “C” on the Nam-gu B and the first floor of Busan.

No one shall exchange, arrange exchange, or repurchase tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products for business purposes.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, at around 20:00 on December 10, 2019, exchanged KRW 80,000 to customers, who obtained 80,000 using game products and obtained 99,00 points from the above PC and obtained 99,00 points.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to one copy of a photograph of each closure;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Articles 44 (1) 2 and 32 (1) 7 of the Act on the Selection and Promotion of the Game Industry, and Selection of Imprisonment with labor;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. For the reason of sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act, the crime of this case is likely to undermine the promotion of the game industry and the establishment of a healthy game culture for the general public, and the nature of the crime is not less than that of the defendant. Although there are criminal records of the same kind, the defendant shows his attitude to recognize and reflect the crime of this case, the crime of this case is only one time, and the profits therefrom are not revealed, and all other circumstances, including the defendant's age, character and conduct, and the circumstances before and after the crime, which are the conditions of sentencing specified in the records and arguments of this case, shall be determined as the disposition

arrow