logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2018.11.30 2017나11578
위자료
Text

1. The plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows. Thus, the reasoning of the court's explanation is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and it is also accepted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. At the bottom of the second part of the judgment of the court of first instance, the parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallels shall be as follows:

“A. The taxi driven by Defendant D (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant taxi”)

)가 2016. 1. 19. 13:50 전주시 덕진구 기린대로 1144 조촌교차로 지하차도를 성덕동 쪽에서 팔복동 쪽으로 편도 2차로 중 1차로로 진행하던 중 도로 결빙으로 인해 미끄러지면서 우측 옹벽을 들이받고 차체가 회전하면서 좌측으로 튕겨나가 차로를 가로막았는데, 같은 방향 2차로에서 뒤따르던 E이 운전하는 화물트럭(이하 ‘2차량’이라 한다

(i)the cargo vehicles driving by F (hereinafter referred to as “three vehicles”) following the vehicle in the same direction, while avoiding Defendant taxi, in conflict with the said taxi at the first lane, and continued to be followed by the same direction.

) In addition, from the first lane, Defendant taxi conflict (hereinafter referred to as “the first accident”).

(B) Part 3 of the first instance judgment No. 4 of the first instance court's decision "B. Determination (which has no proximate causal relation between the first accident and the death of the deceased)" (B).

As ‘judgment', it is difficult to say.

From the fourth to fifth level of the judgment of the first instance court, the first to the second level shall be deleted, and the second level shall be as follows:

【6) The following circumstances are revealed by the facts of recognition and the purport of the entire pleadings as to the claim against Defendant D and Defendant taxi federation, namely, ① The underground passage of the instant accident is 540 meters in total length (400 meters and 140 meters in an underground passage inside a tunnel) and 3.5 meters in width of the road. The location of the first and second accidents was the middle point from the entrance of the underground lane, and ② the form of the said underground lane.

arrow