A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant of leakage of official secrets is a police officer (class mitigation) belonging to the Seoul CPC, who is a person in charge of criminal investigation, etc. at a DNA team, etc., and E, a broker broker for leakage of control information on pseudo petroleum known to ordinary people, was investigated by violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act at the Sungnam branch of the Suwon District Prosecutors' Office, and the Defendant was investigated on June 22, 201 through F, a subordinate employee of the Seoul CPC.

8. On September 3, 2011, through G, a subordinate employee, required to refer to each of the above E’s number of times, and after inquiring through H, a subordinate employee, H on the 31st of the same month, he/she became aware of the fact that E was designated as of August 30, 201, he/she directly inquired about the above number of times on September 3, 201.

On the other hand, there was no fact that the defendant had been investigating E or other related persons about criminal charges, and there was no fact that the C police station in which the defendant was working did not investigate such crimes.

On September 201, 201, the Defendant received request from I who was able to escape life of E to inquire about whether E, and around that time, notified the said I of “the fact that a warrant of arrest was issued to E and that the warrant was issued,” and divulged official secrets pursuant to the relevant laws and regulations.

2. An offender also knew of the fact that he received money and valuables in return for solicitation to public officials related to the control of pseudo Petroleum, and the Defendant was also aware of the fact that E was also under flight, such as the receipt of money and valuables on August 30, 201 through inquire of the details of multiple times as described in paragraph (1).

Nevertheless, on September 201, 201, the Defendant, through I, who was able to escape from E as described in paragraph (1) around September 1, 201, informed E of such fact and facilitate the escape of E, thereby allowing E to escape by committing a crime equivalent to a fine or heavier punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. E, J,.