logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.01.18 2018누64759
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The contents of the Plaintiff’s assertion in the trial of the first instance do not differ significantly from the contents of the Plaintiff’s assertion in the trial of the first instance. However, even if the Plaintiff’s assertion is reviewed together with the evidence submitted in the first instance and the trial of the first instance, it is justifiable to find facts and determine that the Plaintiff did not constitute a refugee.

Therefore, the reasoning for this court’s reasoning is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except when using “this court” as “court of the first instance” in the three pages 10 of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this court’s reasoning is cited as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case should be dismissed as it is without merit. Since the judgment of the court of first instance is just, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow