1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The facts alleged by the Plaintiff in the trial of the first instance are not significantly different from the contents alleged by the Plaintiff in the trial of the first instance, and the fact-finding and decision of the first instance court that the Plaintiff did not constitute a refugee even after re-examination of the Plaintiff’s assertion together with the evidence submitted in the first instance court is justifiable.

Therefore, the reasoning for the court's reasoning for this case is as follows: (a) the evidence Nos. 1 and 3 in the second column of the second half of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed as evidence Nos. 1 and 2; (b) the statement of the grounds for appeal Nos. 3 and 15 shall be deemed as the statement of the grounds for appeal Nos. 1 and 21; and (c) the statement of the grounds for appeal Nos. 3 and 21 shall be deemed as the statement of the grounds for appeal of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the "this court" is deemed as the "court of first instance", and therefore, it shall be cited as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case should be dismissed as it is without merit. Since the judgment of the court of first instance is just, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.