The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the original court’s imprisonment (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable;

2. The judgment of the court below is hard to find the defendant as a beneficiary of basic living, and it is recognized that the defendant has committed the crime of this case repeatedly in the same number at the same place five times for a short period of three months, and the crime of this case is considerably poor. The defendant has been punished for larceny in the past four times, and the criminal defendant has recently been punished for larceny in the past. Since the punishment of larceny is similar to the punishment of the crime of this case, it seems that it is necessary to separate the victims from society for a considerable period of time, considering that it is similar to the punishment of the crime of this case, it seems that the defendant's crime of this case is not against all, and it is necessary to repeat the same mistake. The defendant's age, character and behavior, intelligence and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and circumstances after the crime of this case are considered to be the conditions for the punishment of the crime of this case.

3. Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition