The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable in its summary of the grounds for appeal.

2. In light of various circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the commission of the crime, and the circumstances after the commission of the crime, it cannot be deemed that the lower court’s punishment is heavy, considering the following: (a) the Defendant was against the judgment; (b) some of the damaged items were returned to the victim; (c) the Defendant had the criminal records of having been sentenced one or more times to suspended sentence due to larceny or habitual larceny; (d) the Defendant committed the same crime during the period of repeated crime; and (e) the need to be isolated from society for a long time in light of the habits of the theft; and (e) the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.