1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff entered the Army on January 21, 1971 and was discharged from active service on November 29, 1973 with the maturity of the sick on November 29, 1973.

B. On June 17, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for registration of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State on the ground that “In the first half of the 15th Sick Station, the Plaintiff was put into the military service and was exposed to the crypical noise before the Maternsan on September 1971 while serving in the military, and was exposed to the Matern on February 4, 1972, and was exposed to the Matern, and was exposed to the Matern, and was serious, such as the sound of the math in the 24 hours inside the present 24 hours after being exposed to the Matern,” and applied for registration of the person who rendered distinguished services to the State.

C. On October 10, 2013, the Defendant rendered a decision on the non-conformity of the requirements for persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State or persons wounded in action, soldier or policeman wounded on duty, and persons wounded on duty eligible for veteran’s compensation (hereinafter “instant disposition”) following the deliberation and resolution of the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement to the effect that the injury applied to the Plaintiff was not in proximate causal relation with combat action, the performance of duties corresponding to it, or education and training

On November 20, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an administrative appeal against the instant disposition. However, the Central Administrative Appeals Commission rendered a ruling dismissing the Plaintiff’s claim on April 22, 2014.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2 and 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff asserted that the plaintiff was mobilized to do so in the first half of the 15th Sick Station of the 15th Sick Station of the 1971 while serving in the military, at around September 1971, when he was mobilized to do so in the air, and was exposed to the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the red mountain.

In addition, the plaintiff was dispatched to South and North Korea in around 1972 and was exposed to the general interest, such as engaging in volunteer service only once a week.

Due to the noise exposure, the plaintiff suffered from a defect in hearing, such as the noise from ear, which is string, but failed to receive medical treatment in the military.

The plaintiff has a defect in hearing until now.