1. The Defendant’s decision that rendered against the Plaintiff on January 28, 2014 constituted a non-conformity of the requirements for a person of distinguished service to the State shall be revoked.

2...

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On December 16, 1968, the Plaintiff entered the Army and was dispatched from May 29, 1970 to July 21, 1971, and served as a manager of the telecommunications vehicles. The Plaintiff discharged from military service on December 4, 1971.

B. On February 1971, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration with the Defendant on July 30, 2013 for the registration of persons who rendered distinguished services to the State, on the ground that he/she suffered from the "mar trade" due to firearms accidents during the service of communications vehicles (hereinafter "the instant wounds").

C. Accordingly, on January 28, 2014, the Defendant rendered a decision to the Plaintiff on January 28, 2014, on the ground that the instant wound was not clearly identified as a whole and the developments and causes of the injury cannot be confirmed. Accordingly, the Defendant rendered a non-specific decision-making disposition on the requirements for persons who rendered distinguished services to the State and persons eligible for veteran’s compensation (hereinafter

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there is no dispute, Gap's Nos. 1, 4, Eul's No. 1, 2, and 9, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. On February 1971, when the Plaintiff was dispatched to South and North Korea and was on duty as a manager of a communication vehicle, the Plaintiff’s assertion was divided into two stories with a communication vehicle. The security unit member saw the gun operation method by cutting the gun, and suffered the difference in this case on the right shoulder of the Plaintiff.

Therefore, even though the plaintiff suffered from the injury in the course of performing his/her duties related to combat, the disposition of this case by the prior defendant is unlawful on a different premise.

(b) as shown in the attached Form of the relevant statutes;

C. Facts 1) The Plaintiff was dispatched to South Korea on May 29, 1970 while serving in the military, and served as a manager of a communications vehicle in the 30th Bpool Transport Team 52 joint and several transportation teams of the 9th Assistant Bpool.

B. Telecommunications vehicles are equipped with radio equipment in the animal partitions of military truck, one driver's disease and one war soldier's disease are assigned to one vehicle for communications, and two persons are assigned.