(영문) 전주지방법원 2019.06.19 2019고합67

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 전주지방법원 2019.06.19 2019고합67

성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(주거침입강간)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for four years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant and the Victim B (V, 53 years old) are known to each other.

On October 28, 2018, at around 02:54, the Defendant intruded into the residence of the victim in the former non-owned Army C, and, on his hand, prevented the victim from resisting the victim’s body and arms by taking advantage of the victim’s body and arms out, did not go against the victim’s sexual organ by inserting the victim’s sexual organ into the negative part. However, the Defendant did not go through an attempted attempt because it did not occur under the influence of alcohol.

Accordingly, the defendant invadedd the victim's residence and attempted to rape the victim.

The defendant of "2019 Highest 109" is punished for the defendant, and the victim B (V, 53 years old) resides in the same village, and they are living in the same village, and they are known to the public.

1. Intrusion upon residence;

A. On November 8, 2018, the Defendant committed a crime on or around November 17, 2018, with a view to complying with the Defendant’s refusal of the Defendant’s solicitation, the Defendant entered the victim’s house located on the second floor of the DNA building D, North Korea-U.S., with a view to complying with the Defendant’s refusal of the Defendant’s solicitation. However, the Defendant opened the entrance, without opening the entrance, opened the lock and intruded the victim’s residence.

B. Around December 2, 2018, the Defendant committed the crime, around 20:25, 2018, went into the house of the said victim for the said reasons, but the victim refused to open the door at the request of the Defendant that he would deliver the door, and the victim’s talked of the glass hold installed in the kitchen after the house and then intrudes upon the victim’s house.

2. The Defendant damaged property by eating mind to enter the victim’s house at the time, time, and place specified in paragraph 1(b), and destroying the victim’s house, one set of glass hold (a 60cm x 90cm x 90cm x 10cm x 90cm ) at the market price installed in the kitchen after the victim’s house and the kitchen.

Summary of Evidence

"2019, 67"

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police in relation to B.

유사 판례

-제주지방법원 2019.07.22 2019고단1067

-창원지방법원 진주지원 2015.05.07 2015고합17

-전주지방법원 정읍지원 2019.05.23 2019고단151

-서울동부지방법원 2018.11.02 2018고합216

-수원지방법원 성남지원 2019.05.01 2018고단2495