beta
Text
The defendant is not guilty, and the summary of the judgment of innocence is publicly notified.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged is a person who served on behalf of the Secretariat of the Game Rating Board on the second floor of Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul from September 1, 2007 to December 31, 2009.
As a public official in charge of the D Team, the defendant was in charge of the receipt of the class and issuance of the certificate of class, related affairs of the Rating Council, and civil petition handling affairs related to rating deliberation
Around October 2008, the Defendant came to know F in the process of receiving an objection to the reason why the rating classification of “G” game products applied for rating in “G” from “F,” which is the secretary general of the E Secretariat, was constantly refused by the Defendant at the office of the said Game Rating Board, and thereafter, the Defendant came to have raised an objection against the decision to refuse the rating classification of G game products on January 7, 2009, among those offered by F to the effect that “I would easily change our work related to the rating classification of G game products.”
After that, the Defendant: (a) received a request from F to F under the direction of J, the actual operator of the foregoing E, to the Rating Board’s Council, to the effect that “The objection against G’s game work was passed, and re-scheduled to the Rating Board.” (b) received a request from the Rating Board to the effect that the Defendant’s vehicle parked on the front of the foregoing I received cash of KRW 10 million from the Defendant’s SM5 car parked on the road before the above I, as a reward for its use; (c) received cash of KRW 10 million from the Defendant’s car parked on the road; and (d) received a request from F to June 2009, to the effect that the distribution of the game product applied for rating to the Rating Board may be carried out smoothly, as indicated in the attached list of crimes, to distribute the product from F, who received the direction of J, such as the list of offenses, and received a bribe of KRW 67 million in total at least five times in total.
Accordingly, the defendant accepted a bribe in relation to the public official's duties.
2. The defendant's assertion and F.J.