Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a B car ice.

On July 26, 2013, around 15:30 on July 26, 2013, the Defendant came to an intersection where signal, etc. is installed at which the signal, etc. is to turn to the left at the right-hand turn at the right-hand turn of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the Do, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, the Jin-dong 831-

In such cases, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to confirm whether there is a vehicle passing through an intersection by checking the front side well, and to prevent accidents by safely driving the signal in accordance with the signals of signal apparatus.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the fronter of the victim C(54 years old) driving in accordance with the straight line from the left-hand side of the proceeding direction due to the negligence that led to the left-hand turn, even though the front-hand signal was changed to the vehicle stop signal, as part of the left-hand side of the Defendant Oraba.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the above victims to receive approximately four weeks of medical treatment due to occupational negligence, and caused the victim E (the 27 years old) who was accompanied by the lower part of the Defendant Otoba, to suffer the chille, tension, etc. in need of medical treatment for about three weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement prepared in C and E;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.