A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Seized evidence 3 shall be confiscated.

Victims Nos. 1 and 2 of seized evidence shall be victims.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant accepted the proposal that the defendant would recover the money received from the victims through the crime of ‘singing' from a person who was named in the name of the deceased, and deliver the money to the person who was named in the name.

On February 6, 2018, at around 09:17, 09:17, victim C misrepresented the victim C with the 1 team D of the high-tech criminal investigation at Seoul central office of the Seoul central office of the Republic of Korea, and took a phone, and thereby called “E” arrested the victim, this person committed a fraud in the Internet open market under the name of the party, and the amount of damage is about KRW 37 million, and the amount of damage is about KRW 37 million. As we can confirm whether the party is the victim or the perpetrator, we first withdraw the cash of the party account, and then put the money in storage of the new disease control goods located in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government;

The purpose was to “to return the money after sending the personnel of the Financial Supervisory Service to check whether the victim was a victim after checking whether the money was a victim.”

However, the person who is not the investigation agency such as the prosecutor, the defendant was not an employee of the Financial Supervisory Service, and there was no occurrence of Internet fraud damage due to fraudulent use of the victim's name.

Nevertheless, at around 12:39 on February 6, 2018, a person whose name is infinites caused the victim to keep two goods, which were 7:370,000 won that were withdrawn from the account, at around 12:39, 2018, in order to have the victim keep two goods, which were 1,000,000 won in the new forest of Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the defendant taken the paper bank containing the above 7:37,00 won in keeping the goods at around 12:49 on the same day.

In other words, the police who was in the vicinity of the custody box was arrested after receiving a report from the victim who did not belong to this.

Accordingly, the defendant had attempted to acquire property by deceiving the victim in collusion with his nameless person.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Police in relation to C.