The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal presented a written agreement to the effect that the victim B does not want to be punished against the defendant prior to the pronouncement of the judgment below. Among the facts charged, each intimidation cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent. Thus, the judgment dismissing the prosecution in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act should be pronounced.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of intimidation is erroneous in law.

2. Judgment on misapprehension of legal principles

가. 공소사실의 요지 [각 협박의 점] 1) 피고인은 2018. 5. 4. 20:00경 안산시 단원구 C건물, B관 5층 D백화점 ‘E’ 매장에서 그곳에 근무하는 피해자를 찾아갔으나 피해자가 자리에 없자 피해자에게 전화하여 “너 일하는 D 앞에 똘마니들 풀었으니 밤길 조심해라, 내가 사시미칼 들고 다니니까 너 아킬레스 건 끊어서 못 걸어 다니게 할거야”라고 말하여 피해자를 협박하였다. 2) 피고인은 2018. 5. 16. 17:56경 안산시 단원구 F건물, G호 피해자의 집에 이르러 피해자가 현관문을 열어주지 않자 현관문을 두드리며 “B 이 씨발년아 나와봐”라고 소리치고, 피해자에게 전화하여 “사시미칼로 너 아킬레스건 끊어 버릴거야, 밤길 조심해”라고 말하여 피해자를 협박하였다.

B. Each of the above facts charged is a crime falling under Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 283(3) of the Criminal Act. According to the written agreement entered in B written in the trial record, it can be acknowledged that the victim B explicitly expressed his/her intention not to be punished on June 25, 2018, which is the date of the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution against each of the above facts charged should be dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Nevertheless, it is judged guilty of each crime of intimidation.