All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.

1. Facts charged;

A. On October 27, 2012, the Defendant thought that he was sentenced to imprisonment due to the Victim C (I, 46 years of age) who had returned to a scambling place prior to 10:10 on October 27, 2012, and had the victim talked on the phone to the victim that “I, scamer, and scamed about to die, I would like to die, and the goal of the Defendant would be to kill.”

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim.

B. On October 28, 2012, the Defendant thought that the victim D (the age of 48) who has a relationship with C was punished by the victim C in an unclaimed place C on Oct. 28, 2012, the Defendant: (a) threatened the victim with the victim with a threat that “I wish to have his/her body, life, etc. of the victim, etc. of the victim by saving up his/her body, life, etc.” by walking up his/her phone to the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim.

2. Each of the facts charged in the instant case is a crime falling under Article 283 of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 283(3) of the Criminal Act. According to each written agreement submitted to the court on December 13, 2012 and May 13, 2013, the victims may be recognized as having withdrawn their wish to punish the defendant. Thus, all of the facts charged in the instant case are dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.