beta
Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. (i) The Plaintiff is a non-profit corporation established for the purpose of common welfare, friendship, etc. among its members as a member of an individual taxi transport business entity in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and has set up an ordinary meeting within the association and carries out the business of compensating for damages in accordance with the provisions of the ordinary meeting and the terms and conditions when the member of the upper meeting causes damages to the car owned by its member due to an accident during the possession, use
A is an owner of a private taxi B (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff-Vehicle”), and is a member of the Plaintiff’s association member of the mutual aid association (hereinafter referred to as “instant mutual aid association”).
Belgium The Defendant is a mutual aid business entity that has entered into a mutual aid agreement with respect to Csi (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant vehicle”).
B. On December 15, 2012, the driver of the instant vehicle: (a) driven the Defendant vehicle at around 04:07 on December 15, 2012; (b) driven the Samyang-in distance in 65-2 of the U.S. child of Gangnam-gu Seoul (Seoul) along the four-lanes of the U.S. three-lane distance from the U.S. bank of the U.S. bank of the U.S. bank of the U.S. bank of the U.S. bank of the U.S. bank of the U.S. bank of the vehicle; and (c) caused an accident in which the victim A, who was in accordance with the U.S. bank of the U.S. vehicle of the U.S., was negligent in straighting in violation of the signal on the shooting distance, she
(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”) C.
On January 2, 2013, A submitted a power of attorney to delegate all the powers pertaining to the instant accident to the Plaintiff.
Accordingly, on March 8, 2013, the Plaintiff paid 3,905,000 won directly to the automobile maintenance business office, which was calculated as adequate, out of the repair cost of the Plaintiff’s vehicle destroyed by the instant accident.
【Ground of recognition】 An without dispute, Gap's statements (including number), Gap's 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, and the whole purport of the pleading.