1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.

2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

3. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The following facts may be found either in dispute between the parties or in the entries and images of Gap evidence 1 to 7-1, 2, and Eul evidence 1 to 3 by a combination of the purpose of the entire pleadings:

1) The Plaintiff is a non-profit corporation established for the purpose of common welfare and friendship and friendship among the members of the Plaintiff as a member of a private taxi transport business entity in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and is engaged in the business of making up for damages in accordance with the provisions and terms and conditions of the upper conference in case of damage to a vehicle owned by the member due to an accident during the possession, use, and management of the vehicle. A is a private taxi vehicle B (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff vehicle”).

(2) The Defendant is an insurer who has concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to C Vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant Vehicle”).

(iii) the co-defendant Samsung Fire in the first instance trial is Dsch Rexton vehicle (hereinafter referred to as “sexton vehicle”).

B) On October 16, 2014, the driver of the Defendant vehicle was the insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the vehicle. (B) On October 16, 2014, around 16:40, the driver of the Defendant vehicle stopped on the two-lanes between the two-lanes in order to make it difficult to change the two-lanes due to the surrounding vehicles and the two-lanes of the Defendant vehicle stopped on the two-lanes of the two-lanes between the two-lanes.

2. On the back of the Defendant’s vehicle, the U.S. vehicle is to stop as above, and the vehicle has changed from one to two lanes, but the left wheels has not been completely completed.