logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2019.10.02 2018가단108773
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Defendant B Co., Ltd.: 17,303,380 won and 5% per annum from February 27, 2018 to October 2, 2019.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On December 27, 2016, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “B”) on the whole first floor (hereinafter “first floor building”) among the building D and 7 floors (hereinafter “instant building”); Defendant B is the owner of the instant building; Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “C”) is the company managing the said building in accordance with the management agreement with Defendant B.

B. On January 15, 2018, among the instant buildings, the order and guest rooms of the first floor were flooded (hereinafter “instant first inundation accident”). As a result, the Plaintiff replaced the said order issuing machine, etc. by suffering damage, such as CCTV two CCTVs, damage to one issuer per customer order, damage to a natural wave, etc.

C. On January 25, 2018, a computer room was flooded due to a singler’s wave inside the computer room inside the place of business of the building on the 1st floor (hereinafter “instant secondary flood accident”). As a result, the Plaintiff replaced the said four parts of the machinery due to damage, such as the damage of the ATMs (ATM) for the amount of four prices.

On January 28, 2018, it was flooded inside the guest room due to the well-fluoring wave of the building on the first floor, and "the third flood accident of this case" (hereinafter referred to as "the third flood accident of this case"), and "each flood accident of this case," including the first, second, and third flood accidents, is called "each flood accident of this case".

(E) Accordingly, the Plaintiff: (a) caused damage to the two parts of unmanned public charges and CCTV payment machines; and (b) replaced the two parts of the said public charges payment devices; (c) around February 2018, the Plaintiff paid KRW 473,00 for the parts damaged by each flood accident of this case; (b) KRW 220,00 for the repair cost of the said CCTV; (c) KRW 110,00 for the repair cost of the mechanical room; and (d) KRW 36,300 for the lighting cost, such as replacing the guest charging, etc. for the parts damaged by each flood accident of this case; (d) the Plaintiff paid KRW 473,00 for the repair cost of the said CCTV; and (e) KRW 1,2,300 for the repair cost of the mechanical room; and (e) there was no dispute. 【No ground for recognition”

arrow