logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.02.08 2017고단5611
상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 25, 2017, at around 02:30, the injured Defendant: (a) committed assault against the victim, such as assaulting the victim’s face part of the victim’s face to take part in the victim’s body and continuing to take part in the victim’s body by assaulting the victim by assaulting the victim, namely, the victim’s F (36 years of age) who was another customer, who was an employee E, who was trying to take part in E, who was trying to take part in his or her match without paying the drinking value, and who was trying to take part in his or her ability to take part in the victim’s face for about four weeks.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at the date and time set forth in paragraph (1), and at the place set forth in paragraph (1), sent a disturbance that the security guards and patrol officers assigned to the police box G police box G police box G police box G police box of the Gyeongbuk-do, who received 112 reports in the process of checking the scene, and obstructed the police officers in charge of filing reports on the handling of reports by the flag police officers in front of the patrol, on the ground of the disturbance of drinking by the police officers. The Defendant sent the call to the police officers, such as the flag, “Is the flag, so that Is the flag’s body and the flags who want to board the patrol at one time and one time, and interfere with H’s legitimate performance of duties, such as the handling of reports by the flag on the flag of the police officer in front of the patrol not to start the patrol.

3. The Defendant damaged public goods at the time, at the place, as described in paragraph (1) at the time, and at the place, as above, interfered with the police officers’ performance of duties concerning the handling of 112 reports, etc., and caused the police officers to take the steering boom of J LF Bata, which is a public goods case, in hand, and damaged the 30,000 won of the repair cost of the patrol vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. A statement prepared by the F;

1. Reports on internal accidents, etc. and investigation reports (D customer K statements);

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. A receipt;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the part of violence;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

arrow