beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On May 18, 2018, from around 14:45 to 15:15 on the same day, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s convenience store business by force by avoiding disturbance, such as opening a sales store installed in front of the place for calculating the place, from the “E convenience store,” the victim requested the victim to leave a taxi, but was rejected.
2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties and the injured party interfered with the business of convenience stores as described in the above paragraph 1 on the same day, and around 15:15 on the same day, the Defendant interfered with the business of convenience stores: “The victim G (30 years), a police box belonging to the Sungdong Police Station, called the Defendant after receiving 112 reports, has prevented him from carrying out the business of convenience stores; but the Defendant continued to move back to the convenience store; the victim, etc. arrested the Defendant under the above suspicion and arrested the Defendant in flagrant offender on the charges as above and carried out the patrol vehicle; however, the Defendant refused it by force; the victim was pushed the Defendant into the front patrol box of the Defendant, and the victim was placed in the back of the patrol box of the Defendant and the victim’s left part and left part of the victim’s left part of the front part of the necessary treatment.
As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers with regard to the handling of reported cases and arrest of flagrant offenders, and at the same time injured the victim.
3. The Defendant damaged public goods at the end of the I patrol vehicle, which is parked in the vicinity of the convenience store above Ethmbling from the front seat of the I patrol vehicle at the time of the day specified in the above paragraph 2, and broken off the above glass window to cover approximately KRW 289,410 of the repair cost by walking the back seat of the I patrol vehicle at several times.
Accordingly, the defendant uses patrols in public offices.