logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2012. 11. 29. 선고 2012두18295 판결
(심리불속행) 노외주차장의 비사업용토지 제외 규정으로 수입금액 비율을 규정한 소득세법 시행규칙은 무효규정으로 볼 수 없음[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2011Nu45179 (Law No. 12, 2012)

Case Number of the previous trial

Cho High Court Decision 2010Du2269 ( October 08, 201)

Title

The Enforcement Rule of the Income Tax Act, which provides for the ratio of income to the non-business land in an off-road parking lot, shall not be deemed null and void.

Summary

(Summary) The Enforcement Rule of the Income Tax Act, which provides for the exception of the land used as an off-road parking lot where the amount of income is at least 3/100 of the value of the land for the reasons excluded from the non-business land, can be recognized as reasonable for the purpose of suppressing the demand for real estate speculation and the establishment of the standard.

Cases

2012Du18295 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing capital gains tax

Plaintiff-Appellant

XX

Defendant-Appellee

Head of Yeongdeungpo Tax Office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2011Nu45179 Decided July 12, 2012

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the assertion on the grounds of appeal by the appellant falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal and therefore, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per

Reference materials.

If the grounds for final appeal are not included in the grounds of appeal that make it appropriate for the court of final appeal to become a legal trial, such as matters concerning significant violation of Acts and subordinate statutes, etc., the system of final appeal will not continue to proceed with the deliberation on the merits of the grounds for final appeal, but will not proceed with the deliberation on the merits of the grounds for final

arrow