logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2020.09.16 2020가합31609
약정금
Text

The defendant's KRW 210,00,000 for the plaintiff and its related KRW 6% per annum from September 1, 2019 to February 21, 2020, and the following.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff (Co., Ltd. prior to the change on December 24, 2019) is a corporation with the purpose of operating composite cable broadcasting station business and cable broadcasting business, and the Defendant is a company that carries on the business of manufacturing taxi supplies.

B. On April 29, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into two goods supply contracts with the Defendant to manufacture supplementary equipment related to brand taxi and supply them to the taxi business entity (hereinafter “instant contract”). The specific details are as follows.

1) The contract price for the first supply of goods: The period of 1,412,400,000 won (including value added tax): the amount paid on April 2013 to April 2015: the first (428,00,000 won, up to 30 days after the completion of delivery), second (within 428,00,000 won, within 30 days after delivery), third (within 428,00,000 won, within 30 days after delivery, within 30 days after completion of delivery): The details of the goods supplied: 40,000 won, 6,00,000 won for each brand taxi, crime prevention, etc., 20, 300,000, 30,000,000, 30,000,000,000 won for each of the goods supplied for each of the following items (30,000,0000 won for each of the goods supplied for specific goods: 40,200,00000,00000 or more won;

C. After entering into each of the above contracts, the Plaintiff paid the Defendant the first price (470,800,000 won and 264,000,000 won) under the first and second contracts on May 31, 2013. On July 30, 2013, the Plaintiff paid the second price (470,800,000 won and 264,000,000 won) under the above first and second contracts.

Upon receipt of the price for the goods corresponding to 8,00 set as above from the Plaintiff, the Defendant supplied only part of the goods to the taxi business entity, and entered into a separate agreement with the Plaintiff for the return of the price for the unpaid goods.

arrow