Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,00, and by a fine of KRW 1,500,000, respectively.

The Defendants respectively.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A and Defendant B are between friendships.

A. On November 7, 2017, at around 02:45, the Defendants damaged the victim E-owned market price by breaking a small horse, dispute, while eating in the area of “D food,” which is located in the sphere C in the sphere of Suwon-si, and destroying the cafeteria glass and chairs on the floor, and destroying the valley and heating shield on the floor.

B. The Defendants who interfered with the business of the Defendants interfered with the victim E’s normal restaurant business for about 10 minutes, including: (a) the Defendants collected the tables with the tables, damaged the glass cups, the valleys, etc.; and (b) let the other customers who were in the restaurant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A statement prepared in F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged;

1. The Defendants: Article 366 of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing duties and the selection of fines) (the point of obstructing duties and the selection of fines);

1. Defendants who are subject to aggravated concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37 and Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Defendant A, for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, shall be sentenced to the punishment as set forth in the order, taking into account the following factors: (a) during the period of probation or the fact that Defendant B was sentenced to a fine; and