Defendant

B and C shall be punished by imprisonment for three months.

However, the defendant B and C for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Criminal Records

1. Defendant A was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Western District Court on July 24, 2014, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on July 29, 2014.

2. Defendant B was sentenced to three years of imprisonment for a crime of fraud, etc. at the Seoul Eastern District Court on February 6, 2015 and the said judgment became final and conclusive on February 25, 2015. On May 7, 2015, Defendant B was sentenced to four months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud, etc. at the Seoul Northern District Court on August 28, 2015, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on December 11, 2015. On March 3, 2016, Defendant B was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for a crime of forging a private document, etc. at the Seoul Eastern District Court on March 21, 2016, and was sentenced to five months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud, etc. at the Seoul Eastern District Court on June 21, 2016, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on January 26, 2017 after being sentenced to imprisonment for a crime of fraud, etc. from the Chungcheong District Court on January 26, 2017

3. On February 6, 2015, Defendant C was sentenced to five years of imprisonment for a crime of fraud, etc. at the Seoul Eastern District Court on February 14, 2015, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on February 14, 2015. On October 1, 2015, Defendant C was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud, etc. at the same court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on March 3, 2016. On June 21, 2016, Defendant C was sentenced to five months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud, etc. at the same court.

Criminal facts

The Defendants, along with E and F, forged the document of the lease contract in the name of H against 25 Dong Dong-dong 25, 1502, Jung-gu, Seoul, and forged the document of the lease contract in the name of H, E, as if the lessor was the lessor, and F, as if the lessee was the lessee, the role of Defendant B and the Defendant C bears the interest on the loan in order to prevent the occurrence of the crime from being immediately dismissed, and Defendant A intended to introduce the lending business entity and to receive the loan by deceiving the lending business entity as if there was a claim for the lease deposit against H.

Defendants, as above, are ambiguous by the Defendants, E was forged from the 3rd floor law firm of Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I building to Defendant A’s introduction at around August 22, 2012 to the victim K.