logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2014.05.15 2013고단2801
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동공갈)등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment of one year and three months, and by imprisonment of one year and six months, respectively.

Defendant No. 35 of seized evidence.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants’ co-offenders Defendant A are the I reporter and Defendant B are the I issuer.

( state)The J has been awarded a contract for the “K Road Construction Works” of approximately KRW 150 billion in the cost of the construction from the Sinsi-si around October 201, and the (ju M) LL (Representative M) was awarded by the said J on June 2012 a subcontract for the Nridge and intersection of the said construction work for approximately KRW 6.9 billion in the cost of the construction.

Defendant

A, with the knowledge that the construction of the DNA discharge file in relation to the above L Corporation was carried out by the UDA method, rather than the UDA public law, the U.S. government intended to draw up funds from the persons related to the construction, such as the victim M, etc., who are the representative of L.

Defendant

A, around October 15, 2012, visiting the construction site of the above N B B B B B B B B B, which was located in Silung-si, demanded an interview with construction-related persons, and visited the above construction site several times by demanding related data, which differs from the design of A B B, and the above fact was discussed and the article should be posted.

Accordingly, on October 2012, 2012, the victim M instructed P, a director of the above LP, to see the Defendant A, and the above P sought the method of gathering the above article from the R “R” camera located in Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon. The defendant A stated that “the above problem is not a simple problem as if considered in L,” and continuously viewed the above construction problem.

The above P reported the above facts to the victim, and the victim instructed the above P to continue to meet the defendant A.

On October 2012, 2012, the above P requested a police officer again from the "R" Kaf, not to publish the article of Defendant A, and Defendant A requires the permission of Safin B in order not to display the article.

B At the time of permission, articles will not be published.

arrow