Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, from the date of the final judgment of this case, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person working as the director and reporter of the headquarters of the area northwest-west in the face of D newspapers, and the defendant B is a person working as the director and reporter of the department of the area in Seosan and Thaian area in the face of E.

1. The Defendants, who committed the joint crime on September 2015, found another person’s place of business, etc. using the identity as the reporter around September 2015, and had the intent to attract money and valuables by intimidation in a manner that seems to have an attitude of making it an issue of illegality, such as farmland diversion in the place of business and making it an article.

In September 2015, the Defendants found the H-Maintenance Factory operated by the Victim G (46 years old) G (VF) located in the Seosan City in the middle of September 2015, and revealed the fact that the Defendants were the reporters in the above factory office, and first, Defendant B used the land of the field of night tree as a parking lot for the maintenance factory, and thus, it is illegal for Defendant B to install cement lids in the waterway.

In addition, it refers to the purport that "the oil and melts are emitted from the place where the maintenance factory is concentrated," and the defendant A will report to the victim in violation of the law.

2.3 Ma00 Ma300

I will write the article.

The purport of “the fact of the illegality of the maintenance plant operated by the injured party and the problem were frighten as if they were to be an article.”

Defendant

B In other words, it would be better for the victim to promptly end because it is not good because it is the person who works for the article according to the principle of "A reporter".

“If the victim refuses money and valuables under the pretext of the office work, the victim was frighted as if he were to disappear the illegality and problems of the maintenance plant.

After September 21, 2015, the victim asked the defendant A to request articles or horses by making a telephone around 13:00 on September 21, 2015, and the defendant A taken photographs of the above maintenance plant, etc. from the defendant A by the victim.