logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.05.26 2015나1089
손해배상(의)
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, 17,270,888 won against the Defendants and 500,000 won against the Plaintiff A and the Defendants B.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The status of the parties 1) Defendant D is the E Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).

(2) The Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant surgery”) is the head of the hospital of the Defendant C, and the Plaintiff (hereinafter “Defendant C”) is the head of the Defendant hospital, and the Plaintiff (a child of the Plaintiff) is a person who has undergone a shouldering operation at the Defendant hospital (hereinafter “instant surgery”).

B. On May 7, 2010, Plaintiff A appealed to the left-hand shoulderer’s pain that occurred prior to the instant surgery, and was diagnosed by Defendant C as “Fashion EFFE” and hospitalized on the same day on the same day.

On May 13, 2010, the Plaintiff received an explanation from the Defendant C that the instant operation needs to be performed for treatment, and received the instant operation from the said Defendant on May 13, 2010, including withstanding pressure, salvating salvating salvating salvating salvating salvating salvating salvating salvating salvating salvating sal

Since then, the above plaintiff was discharged on June 10, 201 after receiving treatment for the management of the operation department and the relaxation of pain at the defendant hospital.

C. After the instant surgery, Plaintiff A complained of severe pains and arms on the left shoulder and arms from the date of the instant surgery. On July 12, 2010, Plaintiff A was hospitalized at Defendant Hospital and discharged on or around July 28, 2010, and received treatment on or after the discharge from Defendant Hospital. Plaintiff A was diagnosed on August 26, 2010 on the left side of the instant surgery, due to symptoms, such as flaging and sensing down on the left side, flaging and ging away from the Defendant Hospital. Plaintiff A was diagnosed on the left side of the Plaintiff’s University Hospital, and was diagnosed on August 26, 2010 on the left side of the hospital.

The causes of the relevant medical knowledge 1 upper megama, which are generated by excessively cutting the arms at birth, and after birth such as traffic accidents and industrial accident accidents, the most shaking of these causes is excessive between the head and the head when the patient is taken out, and the head is too far away from the head when the patient is taken out.

arrow