1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The parties 1) Defendant E is the G Hospital located in the F of Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City (hereinafter “instant hospital”).

(2) Plaintiff A is a person who undergoes an operation at the instant hospital as follows, and Plaintiff B and C are children of Plaintiff A.

B. On March 14, 2012, Plaintiff A was diagnosed to escape from a conical signboard No. 6-7 at the instant hospital by visiting the instant hospital due to the rear Dong-dong and the left-hand top-hand side, etc. On March 14, 2012. Accordingly, Plaintiff A hospitalized in the instant hospital on March 20, 2012, and was hospitalized in the instant hospital, and was diagnosed to escape from a conical scopical scopical scopic scopic (hereinafter “the instant first operation”). The Plaintiff A was hospitalized in the instant hospital on March 20, 2012.

(2) On January 11, 2013, the Plaintiff was released from the instant hospital on the 26th day of the same month, and the Plaintiff was diagnosed on January 26, 2013 as follows: (a) the instant hospital had symptoms, such as low-foresting and decline in the calendar; (b) the Plaintiff was diagnosed on January 7 of the 2013.

Accordingly, on the 17th day of the same month, Plaintiff A received from Defendant D the scambling 7 and scambling 1 from Defendant D, and was discharged from the instant hospital on the 26th day of the same month.

C. The plaintiff A’s physical condition is limited to the use of the upper land due to the definite and definite definite, and there is a radioactive shield in the upper land, and the left hand fourth, the fifth hand is the state in which the fingers are completely cut (hereinafter “instant obstacles”).

[Ground of recognition] In the absence of dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 5, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 3 (including each number if any), the court's results of physical appraisal of the Mayor of the Incheon National University of Incheon, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiffs' assertion that Defendant D caused the occurrence of the instant disability to the plaintiff A by negligence, which caused damage to the plaintiff during the execution of the first or second surgery of this case.