beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal and the supplementary selective claims in the trial are all dismissed.
2. After filing an appeal.
Reasons
The court's reasoning concerning this case is as follows: "18,28,00 won total of 18,520,750 won for additional construction work" in Section 2 of Section 2 of Section 1 of Section 2 of Section 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be 43,949,750 won total of 18,717,00 won for additional construction work (43,737,00 won if each of the plaintiff's claims is added to 18,737,00 won)"; "2-B" in Section 2 of Section 3-B of Section 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be as follows; and "2" in Section 5 of Section 5 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed as "written evidence No. 9"; and in addition to the judgment on the grounds for the plaintiff's selective addition in the court of first instance, it shall be justified as it is for the judgment of the court of first instance to 20.
2-2
B. The content of the additional construction claims that KRW 1,00,000 required for changing the location at the Plaintiff’s request after the construction of the main wall and the window, KRW 1,400,000 for marina arrangement cost, KRW 1,500,000 for marina settlement cost, KRW 2,503,00 for other day construction cost, KRW 1,335,00 for additional amount, such as double and floor construction cost, KRW 1,50,00 for the construction cost of the outer window frame, KRW 1,50,000 for the construction cost of the steel pole in the outer window frame, KRW 600 for basic construction cost of KRW 3,700,00 for 800 meters, and KRW 3,000 for each roof roof roof construction cost of the front and rear entrance, KRW 2,79,00 for additional construction cost of steel work.
【Judgment of the cause of the claim added in the trial at the trial, the Plaintiff’s completion of the instant construction work and attached the land subject to construction to the Defendant and the dispute, and the Defendant, around October 17, 2014, agreed to recover the Plaintiff and pay KRW 30 million on the surface of the year of the defect repair work, such as sewerage, water leakage number, living room floor floor, etc., and the Plaintiff completed the said defect repair work on the following day. Therefore, the Defendant asserts that the Plaintiff should pay KRW 30 million to the Plaintiff.
The Defendant agreed to pay KRW 30 million to the Plaintiff on the sole basis of the evidence No. 15.