logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2013.04.08 2013고단397
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치사상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On October 2, 2007, the defendant received a summary order of KRW 2 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) from the Daejeon District Court, and a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for the same crime in the same court on April 17, 2009.

【Criminal Facts】

The Defendant is a person driving B rocketing car as his duties.

On December 22, 2012, the Defendant driven the above vehicle while under the influence of alcohol of 0.216% of blood alcohol concentration at 22:00, while driving the vehicle, and was in the direct progress by using one lane between the two lanes in the direction of the Public Procurement Service in the direction of Daejeon, the Gyeongnam apartment 111-Dong, which is located in the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon.

In such cases, the driver has a duty of care to confirm the safety of the course by properly examining the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and duty of care to prevent the accident by accurately manipulating the brake system, etc.

Nevertheless, the Defendant is driving the said vehicle without neglecting the above duty of care in a state where normal driving is difficult due to the influence of drinking.

It is running ahead of it in the same direction of time.

The part of the back-hand side of the DNA Launa car driven by the victim C, which was stopped for the signal atmosphere, was tamped into the front left-hand side of the Defendant’s driving vehicle, and the part of the back-hand side of the F Spow car driven by the victim E which continued to stop on the two-lanes, was turned into the front left-hand side of the Defendant’s driving vehicle.

The Defendant’s negligence in the above occupational negligence caused the Victim C and the Victim G accompanied by the said D Lastya car to undergo approximately two weeks of treatment, and caused the Victim E to undergo a catum catum catum catum which requires approximately two weeks of treatment, and caused the Victim E to undergo a catum catum catum catum which requires approximately two weeks of treatment, and caused the Victim H to undergo a catum catum catum catum which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

arrow