logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.01.29 2015노1878
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. In light of the following circumstances: (a) the summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) the Defendant recognized the facts charged; (b) the Defendant administered phiphonephones; (c) the her mother voluntarily reported to the prosecution by the her mother for the purpose of cutting off phiphones and cutting off phiphones; and (d) the Defendant and her family members have strong intention of cutting off and treating the phiphones, etc., the sentence of one-year imprisonment imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. In light of the fact that: (a) the Defendant had been punished for the same kind of crime three times; and (b) the Defendant committed the instant crime at least four days since the Defendant had completed the execution of a sentence for the same kind of crime; and (c) the Defendant was arrested due to the administration of philophone, etc. upon reporting by her mother; and (b) the Defendant was arrested due to the administration of philophone, etc.; and (c) was still subject to a suspended sentence due to the consideration of her mother’s limited carbon source, etc., but was still able to take hand over philophones.

Although the Defendant appears to have made a voluntary report on his/her own criminal act to the government agency responsible for the investigation and voluntarily expresses the criminal facts in response to questions or investigations by the investigation agency, it is only confessions, and even if the Defendant voluntarily surrenders, it is merely a fact that the court can voluntarily reduce the punishment against the self-denunciation, and it cannot be said that the Defendant did not reduce the number of self-denunciations (Supreme Court Decision 2006Do4883 Decided September 22, 2006). According to the records, according to the records, the Defendant can be identified that he/she led to the instant criminal act on August 3, 2015 and under investigation by the investigative agency after being arrested by the arrest warrant on his/her road and being investigated by the investigation agency on his/her duty, and that he/she voluntarily surrendered the Defendant.

c. the records.

arrow