[Defendant A, B, C, and D] Defendant A’s fine of KRW 5,00,00,00, Defendant B, and C respectively, and Defendant D’s fine of KRW 2,00,00,00.

Punishment of the crime

[Defendant A, B, C, D, and E] [criminal history] Defendant C was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years and two years in imprisonment without prison labor on December 18, 2017 due to a crime of violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Death or Injury), etc., and the judgment was finalized on January 9, 2018.

Defendant

E was sentenced to one year of suspension of execution for a violation of the Automobile Management Act by the Incheon District Court on February 9, 2017, and the judgment was finalized on February 17, 2017. On November 9, 2017, the Incheon District Court sentenced one year of suspension of execution to four months of imprisonment for a violation of the Automobile Management Act. The judgment was finalized on November 17, 2017.

[2] Defendant B is the representative of “H” for the sale of used cars in the Dong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City G Sales Complex. Defendant A, Defendant C, and Defendant D are the representative of “H” for the sale of used cars in the Dong-gu G Sales Complex. Defendant A, Defendant C, and Defendant D are the representative of H’s heavy trading with H, and Defendant E is the person who posts the heavy and heavy st

1. Defendant A, Defendant C, Defendant D and Defendant E

A. In order to have a high amount arranged fee, the Defendants are informed to the customers of the amount that is less than the actual purchase price of the vehicle and are not charged with the brokerage fee.

After notifying the customer of the difference (the amount calculated by subtracting the actual purchase price of the vehicle from the purchase price of the unfreshed vehicle), the victim J has induced the victim J as a false ticket, so that the victim has made a false representation in arranging the used vehicle, and is recruited to receive a high-amount brokerage fee.

Defendant

E on July 14, 2016, the non-permanent Internet used vehicle transaction site (I) opened K-Stox vehicle, which is not owned by the G-Stop vehicle transaction site, as a false material. On July 14, 2016, the victim contacted to report and purchase it was induced to the G-S to the Defendant A, and then introduced the victim to the Defendant. Defendant C was moving the damaged person into the G-S to the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City L Trading Complex only within the G-Stop Name Station, and was not a vehicle with the “e-Stop vehicle (Internet object)”;

The part of the tubes is ...