1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The parties concerned (i) The defendant is a doctor to establish and operate G Hospital at the Busan East-gu Busan Metropolitan City F (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”). The plaintiff A is a patient who was performed a mass operation from the defendant hospital as follows:

Shed Plaintiff B is the spouse of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff C and D are children of Plaintiff A.

B. (i) On January 21, 2015, Plaintiff A entered the Defendant Hospital to have difficulty in speaking, and first visited the Defendant Hospital to receive the diagnosis of “a functional disorder with respect to the unknown disorder,” and on the 31st of the same month, Plaintiff A received from the Defendant “3do nuclear and workplace escape” under the name of C in the name of C.

B. On June 15, 2015, on the 20th day of the same month, Plaintiff A visited the Defendant hospital due to symptoms of the Jinchise Mau-gun (Sick Code: k580), accompanied by the snow history on the same month, and the Defendant conducted the Plaintiff A’s inspection of the balance of resistances, spacifies, spacific film view, and spacific pressure test.

Consolidated, on January 29, 2016, the plaintiff A visited the defendant hospital again due to the symptoms of workplace escape, and the same year.

2. On January 18, 198, workplace correction surgery was conducted due to workplace escape and speaking practice (hereinafter “instant secondary surgery”).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence, Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 2-1, 2, 3, Gap evidence 1, 2, and Gap evidence 8-1, 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiffs' assertion and judgment

A. The gist of the plaintiffs' assertion (i) The plaintiff A received the first operation of this case after receiving the 3rd nuclear diagnosis from the defendant, and received the first operation of this case. After the operation, the occurrence of the amount of speaking, and the second operation to treat it thereafter, but the amount of speaking has not been cured so far.

Shebly, the defendant, as a doctor, must pay sufficient attention to prevent the occurrence of a merger after the operation.