logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.02.09 2017나2059773
정정보도 등
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On December 30, 2009, the Plaintiff’s major business purpose is the company established by dividing the housing project sector of the Plaintiff, the housing and commercial building construction, the real estate leasing and selling business, etc. of the Plaintiff. (2) Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant B”) is a newspaper publishing “G” and online newspaper H, a major reference week for the current issue. Defendant C is the representative director and editor of Defendant B; Defendant D is the director general of the editing bureau; Defendant E is the head of the economic and cultural team; Defendant F is the reporter of the economic and cultural team.

B. On November 23, 2016, the Defendants published the news articles of the Defendants posted the article as indicated in the [Attachment No. 3] in G (hereinafter “instant article”) and published the article in the online newspaper H also on the same day.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiff’s alleged Defendants refers to: (a) in the article of this case, to the new accounting interpretation of the K Government in December 29, 1999, which was enforced on December 29, 199 by the new accounting interpretation of the K Government in 199, “(56-90).” As such, the Plaintiff’s debt ratio decreased so that a large-scale financial right loan, such as the National Housing Fund, can be obtained; (b) the Plaintiff’s business was growing up through the sales thereof; and (c) the Plaintiff’s L-Chairperson and the K Government made a solicitation to make a tax investigation to M in the course of causing the occurrence of the incident; and (b) the fact that “the Plaintiff’s L president made a solicitation to make a tax investigation to M in sequence” in sequence refers to the fact that “the Plaintiff’s 1- B-B, B-B, and C-B issues are the fact of issues.”

The Plaintiff’s honor was undermined by indicating B.

Therefore, Defendant B shall publish a correction report in attached Form 1 in the weekly area G, and publish a correction report in attached Form 2 in the online newspaper H, respectively, and if Defendant B fails to perform the above publication obligation, it is obligated to pay the Plaintiff an indirect compulsory payment amount of KRW 5 million per day.

arrow