logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.11.12 2015나15780
손해배상(기)등
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The plaintiff shall bear the total costs of the lawsuit after filing the appeal.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company that aims at the management participation and control of other corporations through ownership of shares, and holds 82.1% of the shares issued by G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “G”) with the Internet portal services, which is an Internet portal site, and P2P services.

The daily economy of the defendant is a company for the purpose of publishing and selling newspapers, and the daily economy of the defendant is publishing and publishing the daily economy of the newspaper, and the defendant Hochicom is a company for the purpose of data communications network and telephone business, such as the Internet, PC, etc., and operated online newspaper.mk.co., Ltd. (ww.m.C.r) and receives articles from the daily economy of the defendant and publish it in the Machicom.

B. At around F17:48:05, Defendant Ho.com published the same article as indicated in attached Table 3 (hereinafter “attached Form 3 article”) in the upper end of each of the “F17:48:05,” and the Defendant’s daily economy as “D” in the top end of each of the “Ya economy” A2.

C. In addition, at around L 17:48:36, Defendant each posted the same article as indicated in Appendix 4 (hereinafter “instant article”) in the title “E” in column A24 of each of the “E” as “E”.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 and 2, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 6-1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. In the first instance trial, the Plaintiff asserted that the Defendants had the duty to publish the correction report as indicated in [Attachment 3] and [Attachment 1] and [Attachment 2] to the Plaintiff on the ground that the Defendants infringed the Plaintiff’s honor, reputation, and personal value by publishing the articles of this case and the articles of this case.

The court of first instance has dismissed all the plaintiff's claim, but the court prior to the remand has dismissed the plaintiff's appeal of this case.

arrow