logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.05.22 2013고합800
변호사법위반등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of two years, Defendant B’s fine of 25,00,000 won, Defendant C and D’s fine of 15,00,000 won, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who used the title "H the general director of the Incheon Headquarters, and worked as "H" in the name of the general director of the Incheon Headquarters. Defendant B is a representative director of H, Defendant D is an employee of G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter "G"), Defendant C is a representative director of the I Co., Ltd. (hereinafter "I"), Defendant F is a representative of the I Co., Ltd. (hereinafter "I"), Defendant F is a person working as the representative of V. G is an U created corporation for the purpose of civil engineering, design, supervision, ground development, etc., and H is a corporation for the purpose of civil engineering, construction, etc., and H is a corporation that has subcontracted four construction works, such as soil works, etc., among the civil construction works of G and W Co., Ltd. (hereinafter "W"), and I is a corporation for the purpose of civil engineering, construction, etc., and is a corporation that has been sub-subcontracted by H, such as soil works, etc.

1. Defendant A and Defendant B shall not re-subcontract the subcontracted construction work to any other person;

The Defendants conspired to re-subcontract to the I in return for the soil and water works subcontracted by G andW, Oxemplary water works, and packing works.

From October 29, 2012, the Defendants re-subcontracted 586,834,104 won, 1,218,840,660 won, 660 won, packing 66,47,470 won, and 666,037,470 won.

2. Defendant A

A. On June 2012, the Defendant: (a) requested that F, who was aware of it in Gyeyang-gu Incheon Metropolitan City’s V office located in Gyeyang-gu, Gyeyang-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City, request F to change the pollution of the original contract documents, which are materials inside the city construction contractor, received from WW’s budget vice head and Z; (b) the Defendant violated the Framework Act on the Construction Industry.

The defendant was provided by F with the original contract statement from F, and then ordered C to the representative director of I.

arrow