logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1972. 4. 20. 선고 72다268 판결
[손해배상][집20(1)민,213]
Main Issues

Where there is a substantial relationship between the injury suffered by a mining accident and the suicide;

Summary of Judgment

Since the victim lost his ability to work as a luminous unit due to the mine accident of this case, he lost his ability to work as a luminous unit, due to the loss of the lusular fluoral sption and the husption, and as a daily worker, the victim lost his ability to work at 40%. Thus, if the victim did not have any pain due to the accident after the accident of this case and after the after-accident, there is a proximate causal relation between the injury of this case and the suicide.

[Reference Provisions]

Article 750 of the Civil Act

Plaintiff-Appellee

Plaintiff 1 and five others

Defendant-Appellant

Defendant

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul Civil Area, Seoul High Court Decision 71Na1843 delivered on December 29, 1971

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

The defendant's attorney's grounds of appeal are examined.

According to the judgment of the court of first instance maintained by the court below and its judgment, the victim lost his former labor force as a mining accident of this case of this case of this case of 1970.6.29, and the victim lost his labor force as a worker, and since the victim lost approximately 40% of the total amount of labor force as a worker, the victim did not transfer his life and suffering from the accident of this case after the accident and after the accident of this case, and did not do so and did not commit suicide by non-indicted 12, 1971." Thus, the court below did not err in the misapprehension of legal principles as to the amount of compensation for damages suffered by the plaintiff, and did not err in the misapprehension of legal principles as to the amount of compensation for damages, and did not err in the misapprehension of legal principles as to the amount of compensation for damages by the time the court below did not err in the misapprehension of legal principles as to the amount of compensation for damages suffered by the plaintiff and the suicide (see Supreme Court Decision 67Da1297, Jun. 18, 198, 198).

All arguments are without merit, and they are so decided as per Disposition by the assent of the judge.

The judges of the Supreme Court (Presiding Judge) of the Red Marins (Presiding Judge) of the Republic of Korea

arrow
기타문서