Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and four months, and by imprisonment with prison labor for a year.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

On February 24, 2011, A was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for fraud at the Daegu District Court, and the period of parole on March 30, 2012 was expired on May 12, 2012 in the Common Detention House.

Defendant

B On December 21, 2005, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced 1 year of imprisonment for fraud, 2 years of suspended sentence, 2 years of imprisonment for the same crime in the Western District Court Branch Branch Branch of the Daegu District Court on February 10, 201, 2 years of suspended sentence, 10 months of imprisonment for the same crime in the same court on August 24, 201, and the parole on February 29, 201 in the Daegu Prison Prison on parole on March 13, 2012 during the execution of the sentence.

1. The Defendants’ fraud is in de facto marital relationship.

On September 2013, the Defendants met the victim E, an elementary school of Defendant A, at a coffee shop where it is impossible to know the trade name next to the Gyeongnam-gu, Daegu-gu police officer, and Defendant A made a false statement to the Defendant “A, a director of the social welfare organization, a father-in-person B, is a director of the social welfare organization, who is a father-in-child B. There is an installment savings in the social welfare organization, but upon paying monthly installment savings, the Defendants are able to pay more than 6-10% interest and pay money within 2 years. There are assets of several hundred million won, but there is no money now.” The Defendants made a false statement to the Defendant B that “I will pay interest of 6-10% within two weeks if I will lend money to make an investment in installment savings.”

However, in fact, Defendant B did not have worked as a director for the above self-employed, and there was no such installment savings, so even if the Defendants received money from the victim, they did not have the intent to return high interest rate.

On September 30, 2013, the Defendants received a total of KRW 159,40,000 from the victim, including the remittance of KRW 9.4 million to the new bank passbook in the name of the Defendant A as well as the remittance of KRW 159,40,00 from the victim.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to obtain 159,400,000 won from the victim.

2...