logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2016.09.29 2016고단340
농수산물의원산지표시에관한법률위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months and by a fine not exceeding ten thousand won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person who sells or provides agricultural and fishery products or the processed products thereof after cooking shall place a false indication of the place of origin or place a mark likely to cause confusion therewith.

Nevertheless, from September 15, 2014, the Defendant purchased an imported acid, such as Morocco, China, and protruding, while operating a restaurant in the former North Chang-gun B from around September 15, 2014, and was willing to sell it to customers by deceiving the country of origin as a domestic place of origin.

From September 25, 2014 to September 21, 2015, the Defendant purchased Morocco, China, and fluor fishery fishery partnership corporations, as indicated in the attached list of crimes, total sum of 9,170 kilograms (kg amounting to 28,00 won) from Morocco, China, and fluorine imported from Morocco for sale, as described in the attached list of crimes, and found that the Defendant sold 00,000 won to the above restaurant, with the indication of origin on the board of origin of the restaurant, “Korea”, “Sacheon Korea, Potent Korea, and tideland”, and “0,000 won from the Republic of Korea,” and “0,000 won from the Republic of Korea,” and “0,000,000,000 won from the place of origin of the restaurant,” and “0,000,000 for public relations.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. An import and distribution history report (C cafeteria);

1. Application of investigation reports (verification of the period of sales, explanatory materials, and details of revenue) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Articles 15 and 6 (2) 1 of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that there is no criminal record exceeding a fine and there is no record of being punished for the same crime.

arrow