The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. As to the assertion of misapprehension of the legal principles of the defendant, the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence on June 26, 2007 by habitual larceny, etc., and on July 17, 2008, the defendant again was sentenced to a suspended sentence by the Seoul Western District Court on July 17, 2008. In addition, the defendant was sentenced nine times to a juvenile protective disposition for the same kind of crime, and the defendant again came to engage in the larceny of this case at the time when three years have not passed since the execution of the case was terminated, and the defendant tried to receive a protective disposition on December 28, 2004 by the Suwon District Court on November 13, 2004, and the thief case on November 20, 2007, where it was sentenced to the said suspended sentence, it can be recognized that it is easy for the defendant to use the victim's clothes to manage or take away his/her clothes in the same way as the larceny of this case.

Therefore, the defendant's above misapprehension of legal principles cannot be accepted.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below as to the Defendant’s mental and physical disability (e.g., the key of the victim’s scambling in the scam or the surface of the water room are cut off, and the Defendant’s thief by using the key and by bringing the victim’s clothes to the victim’s scambling, and then bring the victim’s thief, and the Defendant’s thief to the thief, entering the thief immediately before and after the thief’s thief’s thief’s thief’s thief’s thief’s stief’s stief’s stief’s stief’s stief