A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 16, 2017, the Defendant reported to the effect that “the Defendant is in contact with women” in the restaurant located in Daegu-gu, Seogu, Daegu-gu B, and called up on November 16, 2012, and called up, the Defendant: (a) sent to the Defendant at the 112-round slope D, which belongs to the police station Cdistrict; and (b) the Defendant was able to look back to the restaurant, and (c) was able to comply with the Defendant’s request for returning home to the restaurant, and (d) the Defendant was able to keep the bucks where he was able to go back to E while taking a bath, and (d) the Defendant continued to take a slope D’s head on drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the prevention and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to E and D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of a work site for the C District;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. According to Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, the defendant's mistake and reflects the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence, and the defendant has no same kind of criminal record and no record of punishment heavier than the suspended sentence, and all circumstances such as the circumstances of the crime, the degree of the crime, and the record of the crime