logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.08.07 2017구합65389
임시이사선임처분취소청구의 소
Text

1. On August 29, 2017, Plaintiff E’s lawsuit was terminated upon the death of the said Plaintiff.

2. Action against the Plaintiff Educational Foundation A

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Defendant’s revocation of taking office is a school juristic person operating J High School and K High School. 2) The Defendant conducted an audit of J High School and K High School on five occasions from December 1, 2015 to February 23, 2016, and on April 1, 2016, the Plaintiff revoked the Plaintiff’s request to take corrective measures against the existing executive officer for the following reasons: (a) “I, directors I, G, D, L, M, N, P, P, Q, Q, and R at the time of the Plaintiff’s taking office; (b) the Plaintiff’s request to revoke the Plaintiff’s appointment of the existing executive officer for the reason that “the result was shipped by April 8, 2016,” on the ground that “the Plaintiff did not hold a board of directors and falsely prepare meeting minutes; (c) improper appointment procedures; and (d) improper appointment of new executive officer for the same reason.”

3) On September 26, 2016, the Defendant revoked the Plaintiff’s approval of taking office for the existing executives of the instant case, including the Plaintiff C, against the Plaintiff on September 26, 2016 (Evidence A2; hereinafter “instant prior disposition”).

In light of the aforementioned legal principles, the lower court’s determination that “the cancellation disposition of approval of taking office is known” and “the cancellation disposition of approval of taking office” attached thereto are as follows.

Title: The notice of the cancellation of approval of taking office;

2. It is confirmed that the self-audit results of the Office of Education in Korea with respect to school juristic persons A (J: K, K) have resulted in a serious trouble in operating the juristic person and operating the school by violating the Private School Act and relevant Acts and subordinate statutes;

3. In addition, a school juristic person Gap's executive officer under Article 20-2 of the Private School Act (the chief director C, M, directors N, directors'O, directors I, directors L, directors L, directors G, directors P, auditors, Q, R) may cancel the approval of taking office, such as attaching them to 11 executive officers of the school juristic person A pursuant to Article 20-2 of the Private School Act: A Private School Act of the school juristic person.

arrow