logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2015.02.06 2014고단2813
횡령
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] The Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment with prison labor for embezzlement, etc. at the Goyang Branch of the District Court on April 25, 2012, and two years of suspended execution, and the judgment is the same.

5.3. Finality has been made.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Around August 2008, the Defendant viewed that he would appoint a lawyer and let him receive money from the obligor by finding out the concealed property at the N.S. office located in Gyeyang-dong, Busan-dong, 1305, Mangsan-dong, 1305, P.S., the Defendant’s crime committed on May 2008, 208.

After that, around August 2008, the Defendant received promissory notes equivalent to KRW 10 million in cash and face value KRW 6.4 million from the victim's attorney-at-law fees and embezzled them on behalf of the victim by using them as funds for the operation of the Defendant's company at around that time.

2. Around February 2011, the Defendant prepared a notarial deed stating that “If NAD borrowed money from NAD Co., Ltd. as if NAD borrowed money, C would receive dividends from NAD Co., Ltd. in connection with the bonds that it would receive from NAD Co., Ltd., and then lent KRW 180,000 to B on October 1, 2007,” and then applied for dividends in relation to the instant case of seizure and collection order (Seoul Western District Court Decision 2008Ma4262) with the consent of the victim.

After that, around February 22, 2011, the Defendant received dividend of KRW 2,509,910 in relation to the above claim attachment and collection order from the public service center of the Seoul Western District Court located in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and embezzled it as the Defendant’s operating fund.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Prosecutions against the Defendant.

arrow