1. The plaintiffs' selective claims added to the plaintiffs' appeal and the trial are all dismissed.

2. Appeal;

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as to this case is as follows, and the court added the "decision on the plaintiffs' additional claims" under Paragraph 2 as to the plaintiffs' selective claims added in the court of first instance as to the plaintiffs' selective claims. As such, the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

On June 15, 2009, the second 15th 15th 15th 2th 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 20

The second 18th 18th 2nd 2nd 18th 2006 second 15th 2006 second 2006.”

The decision of the first instance court No. 4, 18 of the "Disposition" was made, and the plaintiffs appealed, but they were dismissed.

Part 4 of the Judgment of the first instance court (based on recognition) No. 34, No. 2, shall be added to the part of the Judgment No. 4, 19.

In the first instance court judgment No. 5, the part of the "Evidence No. 13" in the 18th part of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be "each entry of Evidence No. 5, 6, 13, 24, 30".

The part of the 6th judgment of the first instance court is not more than 7 pages.

At the time of the conclusion of the share acquisition contract of this case, the defendant presented Gap evidence 5 (Sales Plan of 2006) and Gap evidence 6 (Business Plan of 2006) to the plaintiff, and actively recommended Eul to accept it. The plaintiff A believed it and got D to accept it. The defendant asserts that the above sales plan and management plan were impossible, even if they were to be realized, the above business could be realized.

However, in light of the statement in Gap evidence 30, the above evidence Nos. 5 and 6 seems to have been prepared and delivered to the plaintiff after the conclusion of the share acquisition contract in this case.

Therefore, Plaintiff A’s assertion that presented the above documents and deceiving Plaintiff A is difficult to believe as it is.

Furthermore, sale and acceptance of the above documents shall be made.